eruv

Ḥawarnas is not forbidden because of Gentile cooking and one may use it for eruv tavšilin. Martisa is not forbidden because of Gentile cooking and one may use it for eruv tavšilin. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun in the name of Rav: Any food which can be eaten alone raw is not in the category of Gentile cooking and one may use it for eruv tavšilin.

nor does one return on its account from the array of war, nor does and Eruv be prepared for it, nor Shittuf, nor does one place therein an Eruv

nor does one return on its account from the array of war, nor does and Eruv be prepared for it, nor Shittuf, nor does one place therein an Eruv

‘Nor does an Eruv be prepared for it, nor Shittuf, nor does one place within an Eruv’. What is the reason? Because it is unsuitable as a dwelling. Now the Eruv of courtyards is not placed within, but a Shittuf may be placed within.

‘Nor does an Eruv be prepared for it, nor Shittuf, nor does one place within an Eruv’. What is the reason? Because it is unsuitable as a dwelling. Now the Eruv of courtyards is not placed within, but a Shittuf may be placed within.

‘Nor does an Eruv be prepared for it, nor Shittuf, nor does one place within an Eruv’. What is the reason? Because it is unsuitable as a dwelling. Now the Eruv of courtyards is not placed within, but a Shittuf may be placed within.

What is the reason? Since it is no worse than a courtyard within an alleyway, The Tana says: ‘The Eruv of courtyards [are placed] in a courtyard, and the shittuf of an alley in the alley’.

And the point was raised, [How can it be said that], The Eruv of courtyards [are placed] in a courtyard? And the Tana says: If a man placed his Eruv in a gatehouse or in an exedra (a semicircular recess), or in a balcony, it is asur and he who dwells within it cannot be a cause of prohibition?

And the point was raised, [How can it be said that], The Eruv of courtyards [are placed] in a courtyard? And the Tana says: If a man placed his Eruv in a gatehouse or in an exedra (a semicircular recess), or in a balcony, it is asur and he who dwells within it cannot be a cause of prohibition?

Judah speaks only there with regard to the eruv of courtyards, which is of rabbinical origin, but here, with regard to the sukkah which is from the Torah, he does not [say so]. ‘Nor does R. Yose hold the opinion of R. Judah,’ for R. Yose speaks only here with regard to the Sukkah which is merely a positive commandment but with regard to Shabbat, which is a prohibition punishable by stoning, he does not say so.