tefillah

As far the Tefillah of the evening, it has no fixed time. The additional Tefillah [may be said] at any time in the day. R. Judah says : Until the seventh hour.

As far the Tefillah of the evening, it has no fixed time. The additional Tefillah [may be said] at any time in the day. R. Judah says : Until the seventh hour.

GEMARA I quote against the Mishnah : The obligation [of the Shema'] is at sunrise, so as to unite the Ge'ullah and the Tefillah, and consequently one says the Tefillah in the day-time!

GEMARA I quote against the Mishnah : The obligation [of the Shema'] is at sunrise, so as to unite the Ge'ullah and the Tefillah, and consequently one says the Tefillah in the day-time!

As for the rest of the world, [they may say it] until midday. And not beyond that? For Rab Mari b. Rab Huna, the son of R. Jeremiah b. Abba, has said in the name of R. Johanan: If a man erred and omitted to say the Tefillah in the evening, he should say it twice in the morning; [if he omitted it] in the morning, he should say it twice in the afternoon.

One can therefore say the prayer all day long ! Up to midday one receives the reward of having said the Tefillah in its due time; but beyond that, one receives the reward of having said the Tefillah, but not the reward of having said it in its due time.

One can therefore say the prayer all day long ! Up to midday one receives the reward of having said the Tefillah in its due time; but beyond that, one receives the reward of having said the Tefillah, but not the reward of having said it in its due time.

The question was asked : How is it if one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah — shall he say it twice in the evening ? If thou thinkest thou canst answer [by quoting] "If one erred and omitted the evening Tefillah, he should say it twice in the morning," [that is different] because it is one day ; as it is written, "And there was evening and there was morning one day " (Gen. i. 5). But here the Tefillah is the substitute for the sacrifice, and the day having passed, the sacrifice becomes void. Or is it perhaps because Tefillah is supplication, and one may pray whenever he wishes?

The question was asked : How is it if one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah — shall he say it twice in the evening ? If thou thinkest thou canst answer [by quoting] "If one erred and omitted the evening Tefillah, he should say it twice in the morning," [that is different] because it is one day ; as it is written, "And there was evening and there was morning one day " (Gen. i. 5). But here the Tefillah is the substitute for the sacrifice, and the day having passed, the sacrifice becomes void. Or is it perhaps because Tefillah is supplication, and one may pray whenever he wishes?

The question was asked : How is it if one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah — shall he say it twice in the evening ? If thou thinkest thou canst answer [by quoting] "If one erred and omitted the evening Tefillah, he should say it twice in the morning," [that is different] because it is one day ; as it is written, "And there was evening and there was morning one day " (Gen. i. 5). But here the Tefillah is the substitute for the sacrifice, and the day having passed, the sacrifice becomes void. Or is it perhaps because Tefillah is supplication, and one may pray whenever he wishes?

The question was asked : How is it if one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah — shall he say it twice in the evening ? If thou thinkest thou canst answer [by quoting] "If one erred and omitted the evening Tefillah, he should say it twice in the morning," [that is different] because it is one day ; as it is written, "And there was evening and there was morning one day " (Gen. i. 5). But here the Tefillah is the substitute for the sacrifice, and the day having passed, the sacrifice becomes void. Or is it perhaps because Tefillah is supplication, and one may pray whenever he wishes?

Come and hear: For Rab Huna b. Judah said in the name of R. Isaac, in the name of R. Johanan: If one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah, he should say it twice in the evening, and the principle "The day having passed, the sacrifice becomes void" does not apply.

It is quoted in objection, "That which is crooked cannot be made straight, and that which is wanting cannot be numbered" (Eccles. i. 15) — "that which is crooked cannot be made straight," i.e. one who has omitted the Shema' of the evening or morning, or the Tefillah of the evening or morning; "and that which is wanting cannot be numbered," i.e. his companions were numbered for the purpose of a religious duty, and he was not numbered among them!

R. Isaac said in the name of R. Johanan: With whom are we here dealing? With one who intentionally omitted [the Shema' or Tefillah].

Our Rabbis have taught : If one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve, he says the Tefillah twice on the night of the Sabbath. If one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah on the Sabbath, he says the week-day Tefillah twice at the conclusion of the Sabbath. In the first he adds the paragraph of "Division," but not in the second. If he added this paragraph in the second and not in the first, then the reading of the first Tefillah counts for him but not the second.

Our Rabbis have taught : If one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve, he says the Tefillah twice on the night of the Sabbath. If one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah on the Sabbath, he says the week-day Tefillah twice at the conclusion of the Sabbath. In the first he adds the paragraph of "Division," but not in the second. If he added this paragraph in the second and not in the first, then the reading of the first Tefillah counts for him but not the second.

Our Rabbis have taught : If one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve, he says the Tefillah twice on the night of the Sabbath. If one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah on the Sabbath, he says the week-day Tefillah twice at the conclusion of the Sabbath. In the first he adds the paragraph of "Division," but not in the second. If he added this paragraph in the second and not in the first, then the reading of the first Tefillah counts for him but not the second.

Our Rabbis have taught : If one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve, he says the Tefillah twice on the night of the Sabbath. If one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah on the Sabbath, he says the week-day Tefillah twice at the conclusion of the Sabbath. In the first he adds the paragraph of "Division," but not in the second. If he added this paragraph in the second and not in the first, then the reading of the first Tefillah counts for him but not the second.

Our Rabbis have taught : If one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve, he says the Tefillah twice on the night of the Sabbath. If one erred and omitted the afternoon Tefillah on the Sabbath, he says the week-day Tefillah twice at the conclusion of the Sabbath. In the first he adds the paragraph of "Division," but not in the second. If he added this paragraph in the second and not in the first, then the reading of the first Tefillah counts for him but not the second.

One might deduce from this teaching that since he did not add the paragraph of "Division" in the first Tefillah, he is as though he had not prayed at all and we make him repeat it.

There is a teaching in agreement with both of them. There is a teaching in agreement with R. Jose b. R. Hannina: Abraham instituted the morning Tefillah; as it is said, "And Abraham got up early in the morning to the place where he had stood" (Gen. xix. 27) — "standing" means prayer; as it is said, "Then stood up Phineas and prayed" (Ps. cvi. 30).

Isaac instituted the afternoon Tefillah; as it is said, "And Isaac went out to meditate in the field at eventide" (Gen. xxiv. 63) — "meditation" [sihah] means prayer; as it is said, "A prayer of the afflicted when he fainteth, and poureth out his complaint [sihah] before the Lord" (Ps, cii. 1).

Jacob instituted the evening Tefillah ; as it is said, "And he lighted [paga'] upon the place, and tarried there all night" (Gen. xxviii. 11) — "alighting" means prayer; as it is said, "Therefore pray not thou for this people, neither lift up cry nor prayer for them, neither make intercession [paga'] to Me" (Jer. vii. 16).

There is also a teaching in agreement with R. Joshua b. Levi : Why is it declaimed: The morning Tefillah [may be said] until midday ? Because the morning continual offering could be brought until midday. R. Judah says : Until the fourth hour, because the morning continual offering could be brought until the fourth hour.

And why is it declared : The afternoon Tefillah [may be said] until the evening? Because the twilight continual offering could be brought until the evening. B. Judah says : Until the middle of the afternoon, because the twilight continual offering could be brought until the middle of the afternoon.

And why is it declared : As for the Tefillah of the evening, it has no fixed time? Because the limbs and the fat which had not been consumed by the evening may be offered at any time during the night.

And why is it declared : The additional Tefillah [may be said] at any time in the day? Because the additional offering could be brought at any time during the day. R. Judah says : Until the seventh hour, because the additional offering could be brought until the seventh hour.

We might suppose that this is a refutation of R. Jose b. R. Hannina! But he could reply : I certainly maintain that the Patriarchs instituted the Tefillot, but the Rabbis subsequently found a basis for them in the sacrifices. For if thou sayest not so, who instituted the additional Tefillah, according to R. Jose b. R. Hannina? But the Patriarchs instituted the Tefillot, and the Rabbis subsequently found a basis for them in the sacrifices.

What, then, does it signify? Until but not including. Let me, then, quote the sequel of the teaching: The additional Tefillah [may he said] at any time in the day. R. Judah says: Until the seventh hour. But there is a teaching: If there be before a man two Tefillot, one the additional and the other of the afternoon, he should say that of the afternoon and afterwards the additional ; because the former is constant, the latter not constant. R. Judah says: He should first recite the additional Tefillah and afterwards that of the afternoon, because [the time of the former] lapses, but the other does not.

What, then, does it signify? Until but not including. Let me, then, quote the sequel of the teaching: The additional Tefillah [may he said] at any time in the day. R. Judah says: Until the seventh hour. But there is a teaching: If there be before a man two Tefillot, one the additional and the other of the afternoon, he should say that of the afternoon and afterwards the additional ; because the former is constant, the latter not constant. R. Judah says: He should first recite the additional Tefillah and afterwards that of the afternoon, because [the time of the former] lapses, but the other does not.

That is quite right if thou maintainest that "until" means including, and thus the two Tefillot are found together; but if thou maintainest that "until" means excluding, how is it these two Tefillot are found together? For when the time of the afternoon Tefillah has arrived, the time of the additional Tefillah has passed!

That is quite right if thou maintainest that "until" means including, and thus the two Tefillot are found together; but if thou maintainest that "until" means excluding, how is it these two Tefillot are found together? For when the time of the afternoon Tefillah has arrived, the time of the additional Tefillah has passed!

The afternoon Tefillah [may he said] until the evening. R. Judah says: Until the middle of the afternoon. Rab Hisda asked Rab Isaac: Rab Kahana stated above that the Halakah is in accordance with R. Judah since there is such a teaching in the Behirta. How is it here? He was silent and answered him not a word. Rab Hisda said : "We see from the fact that Rab recited the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve while it was yet day, it is to be concluded that the Halakah is in agreement with R, Judah !

The afternoon Tefillah [may he said] until the evening. R. Judah says: Until the middle of the afternoon. Rab Hisda asked Rab Isaac: Rab Kahana stated above that the Halakah is in accordance with R. Judah since there is such a teaching in the Behirta. How is it here? He was silent and answered him not a word. Rab Hisda said : "We see from the fact that Rab recited the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve while it was yet day, it is to be concluded that the Halakah is in agreement with R, Judah !

On the contrary, from the fact that Rab Huna and the Rabbis did not say the [Sabbath]- Tefillah until it was night, conclude that the Halakah is not in agreement with R. Judah. Since it has not been reported whether the Halakah accords with either, he who acted in agreement with the one did rightly, and he who acted in agreement with the other did rightly.

Rab went on a visit to the house of Geniba and said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve. R. Jeremiah b. Abba was praying behind Rab, and when the latter finished his Tefillah he did not interrupt the devotions of R. Jeremiah. Draw three deductions from this : A man may say the Sabbath- Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve ; a disciple may pray behind his master ; and it is forbidden to pass in front of those who are saying the Tefillah.

Rab went on a visit to the house of Geniba and said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve. R. Jeremiah b. Abba was praying behind Rab, and when the latter finished his Tefillah he did not interrupt the devotions of R. Jeremiah. Draw three deductions from this : A man may say the Sabbath- Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve ; a disciple may pray behind his master ; and it is forbidden to pass in front of those who are saying the Tefillah.

Rab went on a visit to the house of Geniba and said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve. R. Jeremiah b. Abba was praying behind Rab, and when the latter finished his Tefillah he did not interrupt the devotions of R. Jeremiah. Draw three deductions from this : A man may say the Sabbath- Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve ; a disciple may pray behind his master ; and it is forbidden to pass in front of those who are saying the Tefillah.

Rab went on a visit to the house of Geniba and said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve. R. Jeremiah b. Abba was praying behind Rab, and when the latter finished his Tefillah he did not interrupt the devotions of R. Jeremiah. Draw three deductions from this : A man may say the Sabbath- Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve ; a disciple may pray behind his master ; and it is forbidden to pass in front of those who are saying the Tefillah.

[This last-mentioned] supports the teaching of R. Joshua b. Levi : It is forbidden to pass in front of those who are saying the Tefillah. But it is not so, seeing that R. Assi and R. Ammi did so pass ! It was beyond a distance of four cubits that R. Ammi and R. Assi passed.

But had he made the 'division'? For lo, R. Abin said : On one occasion Rabbi said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve, and then entered the bath and came out and taught us our chapter ; and it was not yet dark ! Rab said : He must have gone into the bath-house only to perspire, and that happened before the decree was issued against it.

Can a mistake [of this nature] be rectified? For Abidan said : On one occasion the heavens became thick with clouds, so that the people were led to believe that it was dusk. They entered the Synagogue and said the Tefillah for the conclusion of the Sabbath on the Sabbath. Afterwards the clouds dispersed and the sun shone forth ; so they came and put the question to Rabbi. His reply was that

since they had said the Tefillah, it must stand. It is different with a Congregation, because we do not put them to trouble.

R. Hiyya b. Ashe said: Rab said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve ; R. Josiah said the Tefillah for the conclusion of the Sabbath on the Sabbath. "Rab said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve" — did he recite the "Sanctification" over the cup of wine, or did he omit it? Come and hear : For Rab Nahman said in the name of Samuel : A man may say the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve and recite the "Sanctification" over the cup of wine; and the Halakah is in accord with his view.

R. Hiyya b. Ashe said: Rab said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve ; R. Josiah said the Tefillah for the conclusion of the Sabbath on the Sabbath. "Rab said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve" — did he recite the "Sanctification" over the cup of wine, or did he omit it? Come and hear : For Rab Nahman said in the name of Samuel : A man may say the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve and recite the "Sanctification" over the cup of wine; and the Halakah is in accord with his view.

R. Hiyya b. Ashe said: Rab said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve ; R. Josiah said the Tefillah for the conclusion of the Sabbath on the Sabbath. "Rab said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve" — did he recite the "Sanctification" over the cup of wine, or did he omit it? Come and hear : For Rab Nahman said in the name of Samuel : A man may say the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve and recite the "Sanctification" over the cup of wine; and the Halakah is in accord with his view.

R. Hiyya b. Ashe said: Rab said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve ; R. Josiah said the Tefillah for the conclusion of the Sabbath on the Sabbath. "Rab said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve" — did he recite the "Sanctification" over the cup of wine, or did he omit it? Come and hear : For Rab Nahman said in the name of Samuel : A man may say the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve and recite the "Sanctification" over the cup of wine; and the Halakah is in accord with his view.

"R. Josiah said the Tefillah for the conclusion of the Sabbath on the Sabbath" did he recite the Habdalah over the cup of wine or did he omit it? Come and hear : For Rab Judah said in the name of Samuel : A man may say the Tefillah for the conclusion of the Sabbath on the Sabbath and recite the Habdalah over the cup of wine.

"R. Josiah said the Tefillah for the conclusion of the Sabbath on the Sabbath" did he recite the Habdalah over the cup of wine or did he omit it? Come and hear : For Rab Judah said in the name of Samuel : A man may say the Tefillah for the conclusion of the Sabbath on the Sabbath and recite the Habdalah over the cup of wine.

R. Zera said in the name of R. Assi, in the name of R. Eleazar, in the name of R. Hannina, in the name of Rab : At the side of this pillar, R. Ishmael b. R. Jose said the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve.

When 'Ulla came he said : It was at the side of this palm-tree, not pillar ; it was not R. Ishmael b. R. Jose, but R. Eleazar b. R. Jose ; and it was not the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve, but the Tefillah for the conclusion of the Sabbath on the Sabbath.

When 'Ulla came he said : It was at the side of this palm-tree, not pillar ; it was not R. Ishmael b. R. Jose, but R. Eleazar b. R. Jose ; and it was not the Sabbath-Tefillah on the Sabbath-eve, but the Tefillah for the conclusion of the Sabbath on the Sabbath.

As for the Tefillah of the evening, it has no fixed time. What means it has no fixed time? If we are to suppose that should a man so desire, he can say the Tefillah at any time during the night, then let the Mishnah teach explicitly, "The evening Tefillah [may be said] at any time during the night"! What, then, means it has no fixed time?

As for the Tefillah of the evening, it has no fixed time. What means it has no fixed time? If we are to suppose that should a man so desire, he can say the Tefillah at any time during the night, then let the Mishnah teach explicitly, "The evening Tefillah [may be said] at any time during the night"! What, then, means it has no fixed time?

As for the Tefillah of the evening, it has no fixed time. What means it has no fixed time? If we are to suppose that should a man so desire, he can say the Tefillah at any time during the night, then let the Mishnah teach explicitly, "The evening Tefillah [may be said] at any time during the night"! What, then, means it has no fixed time?

It is in accord with him who declared that the evening-Tefillah is voluntary; for Rab Judah said in the name of Samuel: As for the evemng-Tefillah, Rabban Gamaliel declares it to be obligatory, but R. Joshua declares it to be voluntary. Abbai said : The Halakah is in agreement with him who declares it to be obligatory ; but Raba said : The Halakah is in agreement with him who declares it to be voluntary.

It is in accord with him who declared that the evening-Tefillah is voluntary; for Rab Judah said in the name of Samuel: As for the evemng-Tefillah, Rabban Gamaliel declares it to be obligatory, but R. Joshua declares it to be voluntary. Abbai said : The Halakah is in agreement with him who declares it to be obligatory ; but Raba said : The Halakah is in agreement with him who declares it to be voluntary.

Our Rabbis have taught : It happened that a disciple came before R. Joshua and asked him, "Is the evening-Tefillah voluntary or obligatory?" He replied, "It is voluntary."

When the shield-bearers had assembled, the questioner stood up and asked, "Is the evening-Tefillah voluntary or obligatory ?" Rabban Gamaliel replied, "It is obligatory." Rabban Gamaliel said to the Sages, "Is there anyone who has a different opinion on this matter?" R. Joshua said to him, "No" Then Rabban Gamaliel said to him, "But has it not been reported to me in thy name that it is voluntary ?"

The additional Tefillah [may he said] at any time in the day. [R. Judah says: Until the seventh hour.] R. Johanan said : If one reads it after the seventh hour, he is called a transgressor.

Our Rabbis have taught: If there be before a man two Tefillot, one of the afternoon and the other the additional, he should say that of the afternoon and afterwards the additional, because the former is constant, the latter not constant. R. Judah says : He should first recite the additional Tefillah and afterwards that of the afternoon, because the former is a duty that lapses, but the other is not. R. Johanan said : The Halakah is — one first says the afternoon Tefillah and then the additional.

Our Rabbis have taught: If there be before a man two Tefillot, one of the afternoon and the other the additional, he should say that of the afternoon and afterwards the additional, because the former is constant, the latter not constant. R. Judah says : He should first recite the additional Tefillah and afterwards that of the afternoon, because the former is a duty that lapses, but the other is not. R. Johanan said : The Halakah is — one first says the afternoon Tefillah and then the additional.

When R. Zera was weary of study, he used to go and sit at the entrance of the school of R. Nathan b. Tobi saying, "When the Rabbis pass by, I will stand up before them and receive the reward" He once went out ; and when R. Nathan b. Tobi came he asked him, "Who is stating the Halakah in the House of Study?" He replied, "Thus spake R. Johanan : The Halakah is not according to R. Judah who said , 'He should first recite the additional Tefillah and afterwards that of the afternoon'."

R. Joshua b. Levi said : Whoever prays the additional Tefillah after the seventh hour, as taught by R. Judah, of him the Scriptures state, "Those who are smitten [nuge] because of the advocated appointed seasons will I gather, who are of thee" (Zeph. iii. 18). How is it known that nuge is a term of "breaking" ? As Rab Joseph translated : "A breach has come upon the enemies of the house of Israel because they delayed the times of the festivals in Jerusalem."

R. Eleazar said : Whoever says the morning Tefillah after the fourth hour, of him the Scriptures declare, "Those who are troubled [nuge] because of the appointed seasons will I gather, who are of thee." How is it known that nuge is a term for "trouble" ? For it is written, "My soul melteth away from heaviness [tugah]" (Ps. cxix. 28). Rab Nahman b. Isaac said : From the following : "Her virgins are afflicted [nugot], and she herself is in bitterness" (Lam. i. 4).

Rab Iwya was ill and did not attend Rab Joseph's discourse. The next day when he arrived, Abbai wished to set Rab Joseph's mind at rest ; so he said to him, "For what reason did not the master attend the discourse?" He replied, "My heart was faint and I could not." He asked him, "Why didst thou not eat something and come?" He answered, "Does not the master agree with the opinion of Rab Huna who said : It is forbidden a man to eat anything before praying the additional Tefillah?" He replied, "Then the master should have said the additional Tefillah by himself and eaten something and attended." He said to him, "Does not the master agree with the opinion of R. Johanan who declared : A man is forbidden to anticipate the congregational Tefillah by praying alone?" He replied, "But has it not been reported in this connection : R. Abba said : This teaching applies only when he is with the Congregation?"

Rab Iwya was ill and did not attend Rab Joseph's discourse. The next day when he arrived, Abbai wished to set Rab Joseph's mind at rest ; so he said to him, "For what reason did not the master attend the discourse?" He replied, "My heart was faint and I could not." He asked him, "Why didst thou not eat something and come?" He answered, "Does not the master agree with the opinion of Rab Huna who said : It is forbidden a man to eat anything before praying the additional Tefillah?" He replied, "Then the master should have said the additional Tefillah by himself and eaten something and attended." He said to him, "Does not the master agree with the opinion of R. Johanan who declared : A man is forbidden to anticipate the congregational Tefillah by praying alone?" He replied, "But has it not been reported in this connection : R. Abba said : This teaching applies only when he is with the Congregation?"

Rab Iwya was ill and did not attend Rab Joseph's discourse. The next day when he arrived, Abbai wished to set Rab Joseph's mind at rest ; so he said to him, "For what reason did not the master attend the discourse?" He replied, "My heart was faint and I could not." He asked him, "Why didst thou not eat something and come?" He answered, "Does not the master agree with the opinion of Rab Huna who said : It is forbidden a man to eat anything before praying the additional Tefillah?" He replied, "Then the master should have said the additional Tefillah by himself and eaten something and attended." He said to him, "Does not the master agree with the opinion of R. Johanan who declared : A man is forbidden to anticipate the congregational Tefillah by praying alone?" He replied, "But has it not been reported in this connection : R. Abba said : This teaching applies only when he is with the Congregation?"

The Halakah is in accord neither with Rab Huna nor R. Joshua b. Levi. [It is not] in accord with Rab Huna, as is here mentioned. [Nor is it] in accord with R. Joshua b. Levi who said : When the time of the afternoon Tefillah has arrived, it is forbidden to eat anything before praying the afternoon Tefillah.

The Halakah is in accord neither with Rab Huna nor R. Joshua b. Levi. [It is not] in accord with Rab Huna, as is here mentioned. [Nor is it] in accord with R. Joshua b. Levi who said : When the time of the afternoon Tefillah has arrived, it is forbidden to eat anything before praying the afternoon Tefillah.

If he is riding upon an ass, he should alight and say the Tefillah ; but if he is unable to alight, he should turn his face [in the direction of Jerusalem] If he is unable to turn his face, he should direct his heart towards the Holy of Holies. If he is journeying in a ship or on a raft, he should direct his heart towards the Holy of Holies.

R. Tanhum also said in the name of R. Joshua b. Levi : When one says the Tefillah, he must bow until all the vertebrae in the spine are loosened.

To what do the nine benedictions in the New Year Tefillah correspond ? R. Isaac of Kartignin said : To the nine references to the Divine Name which Hannah made in her prayer (I Sam. ii. 1-10) ; for the teacher said : On the New Year's day Sarah, Rachel and Hannah were "visited."

Mar Zotra objected : Let it be included in brief in the [shortened] Tefillah, thus: "Give us understanding, Thou Who dividest between holy and profane" ! The question [remained unanswered].

R. Tanhum said in the name of R. Assi, in the name of R. Joshua b. Levi : If a man erred and omitted the reference to the New Moon in the sixteenth benediction, he must repeat it. If he reminded himself thereof in the seventeenth benediction, he goes back to the sixteenth ; if in the eighteenth, he goes back to the sixteenth. If he had concluded the Tefillah, he must recommence it.

Rab Pappa the son of Rab Aha b. Adda said : The statement "If he had concluded the Tefillah, he must recommence it" only applies should he have moved his feet ; but if he has not done so, he returns to the sixteenth benediction.

Rab Nahman b. Isaac said : The statement that if he had moved his feet he must recommence the Tefillah applies only to one who is not accustomed to offer personal supplications at its conclusion ; but if that be his practice, he returns to the sixteenth benediction.

Another version is : Rab Nahman b. Isaac said : The statement that if he had not moved his feet, he returns to the sixteenth benediction applies only to one who is accustomed to offer personal supplication at the conclusion of the Tefillah ; but if that be not his practice, he goes back to its commencement.

"What is the difference between "Give us understanding" and the short prayer? "Give us understanding" requires three benedictions before and three after it, and when he reaches his house, he need not again say the Tefillah ; whereas with the short prayer there is no necessity to utter the three benedictions before and after, but when he reaches his house, he must say the Tefillah.

"What is the difference between "Give us understanding" and the short prayer? "Give us understanding" requires three benedictions before and three after it, and when he reaches his house, he need not again say the Tefillah ; whereas with the short prayer there is no necessity to utter the three benedictions before and after, but when he reaches his house, he must say the Tefillah.

If he is riding upon an ass, he should alight and say the Tefillah. Our Rabbis have taught : If a man is riding upon an ass and the time of the Tefillah arrives, should he have somebody to hold his ass, he must alight and pray ; but if not, he sits in his place and prays. Rabbi says : In either case, he should sit in his place and pray, because his mind is unsettled.

If he is riding upon an ass, he should alight and say the Tefillah. Our Rabbis have taught : If a man is riding upon an ass and the time of the Tefillah arrives, should he have somebody to hold his ass, he must alight and pray ; but if not, he sits in his place and prays. Rabbi says : In either case, he should sit in his place and pray, because his mind is unsettled.

Samuel's father and Levi, when they wished to set out on a journey, used to rise up early and say the Tefillah; and when the time arrived for reading the Shema'

they read it then. In accord with whose opinion is this ? That of the Tanna of the teaching : If one rises early to set out on a journey, they may bring him a Shofar which he blows, a Lulab which he shakes, a Megillah in which he reads ; and when the time arrives for reading the Shema' he reads it. If he rose early to sit in a travelling coach or ship, he may say the Tefillah, and when the time arrives for reading the Shema' he reads it.

R. Simeon b. Eleazar says : In all circumstances, he reads the Shema' and then says the Tefillah in order to unite it with the Ge'ullah.

In what do they differ ? The former holds that to say the Tefillah standing is of greater importance; the latter holds that to unite the Ge'ullah with the Tefillah is of greater importance.

In what do they differ ? The former holds that to say the Tefillah standing is of greater importance; the latter holds that to unite the Ge'ullah with the Tefillah is of greater importance.

Rab Ashe used to say the prayers in the presence of the assembly alone and sitting, and when he returned to his house, he again said the Tefillah standing. The Rabbis said to him, "The master should act like Maremar and Mar Zotra." He replied, "It is too much trouble for me." "Then let the master act like Samuel's father and Levi." He replied, "We have not seen the Rabbis who are older than we acting in this manner."

MISHNAH R. Eleazar b. 'Azariah says : The additional Tefillah is only to be said with the local Congregation. The Sages say: Whether with or without the local Congregation. R. Judah says in his name: In any place where there is a local Congregation, the individual is exempt from the additional Tefillah.

MISHNAH R. Eleazar b. 'Azariah says : The additional Tefillah is only to be said with the local Congregation. The Sages say: Whether with or without the local Congregation. R. Judah says in his name: In any place where there is a local Congregation, the individual is exempt from the additional Tefillah.

GEMARA R. Judah is identical with the first Tanna's view ! There is a difference between them, viz. : an individual who lives in a place where there is no local Congregation. The first Tanna holds that he is exempt [from the additional Tefillah], but R. Judah holds that he is under the obligation.

Rab Huna b. Hinnana said in the name of Rab Hiyya b. Rab : The Halakah is in agreement with R. Judah as stated in the name of R. Eleazar b. 'Azariah. Rab Hiyya b. Abin said to him : Thou hast said well ; for Samuel has declared : Never have I said the additional Tefillah alone

in Nehardea except on the day when the king's army came to the town, and the Rabbis were so troubled that they did not say the Tefillah, and I said it alone, because I was like an individual without a local Congregation.

R. Johanan said, "I noticed that R. Jannai said the Tefillah and then said another Tefillah." R. Jeremiah said to R. Zera, "Perhaps he did not at first direct his heart [to his prayer] and finally did so!" He replied, "See how great a man testifies concerning him."

R. Johanan said, "I noticed that R. Jannai said the Tefillah and then said another Tefillah." R. Jeremiah said to R. Zera, "Perhaps he did not at first direct his heart [to his prayer] and finally did so!" He replied, "See how great a man testifies concerning him."

Although there were thirteen Synagogues in Tiberias, R. Ammi and R. Assi never said the Tefillah except between the pillars where they studied.

It has been reported : Rab Isaac b. Abdemi said in the name of our teacher : The Halakah is in agreement with R. Judah as stated in the name of R. Eleazar b. 'Azariah. R. Hiyya b. Abba said the Tefillah and then said another. R. Zera asked him, "Why did the master act so? Is it because the master did not direct his heart [with the first] ? But R. Eleazar has said : A man should always examine himself; if he can direct his heart, then let him pray, but if not, he should not pray ! Or is it because the master did not include the reference to the New Moon [in the first Tefillah]? But there is a teaching:

It has been reported : Rab Isaac b. Abdemi said in the name of our teacher : The Halakah is in agreement with R. Judah as stated in the name of R. Eleazar b. 'Azariah. R. Hiyya b. Abba said the Tefillah and then said another. R. Zera asked him, "Why did the master act so? Is it because the master did not direct his heart [with the first] ? But R. Eleazar has said : A man should always examine himself; if he can direct his heart, then let him pray, but if not, he should not pray ! Or is it because the master did not include the reference to the New Moon [in the first Tefillah]? But there is a teaching:

If a man erred and omitted the reference to the New Moon in the evening Tefillah, we do not require him to repeat it, because he can say it in the morning Tefillah; [if he omitted it] in the morning, we do not require him to repeat it, because he can say it in the additional Tefillah ; [if he omitted it] in the additional Tefillah, we do not require him to repeat it, because he can say it in the afternoon ! "

If a man erred and omitted the reference to the New Moon in the evening Tefillah, we do not require him to repeat it, because he can say it in the morning Tefillah; [if he omitted it] in the morning, we do not require him to repeat it, because he can say it in the additional Tefillah ; [if he omitted it] in the additional Tefillah, we do not require him to repeat it, because he can say it in the afternoon ! "