yosi

Moreover, it is said the companions who were with Rabbi Schimeon were numbered, and they were found to consist of Rabbi Eleazar, his son; and Rabbi Abba, and Rabbi Yehuda, and Rabbi Yosi the son of Jacob, and Rabbi Isaac, and Rabbi Chisqiah the son of Rav, and Rabbi Chiya, and Rabbi Yosi, and Rabbi Yisa.

Moreover, it is said the companions who were with Rabbi Schimeon were numbered, and they were found to consist of Rabbi Eleazar, his son; and Rabbi Abba, and Rabbi Yehuda, and Rabbi Yosi the son of Jacob, and Rabbi Isaac, and Rabbi Chisqiah the son of Rav, and Rabbi Chiya, and Rabbi Yosi, and Rabbi Yisa.

Apparently four spirits (are described) here. But we have already said that the Spirit is one; why, then, are three (others added unto it?) Arise, Rabbi Yosi, in thy place.

Rabbi Yosi arose and said: “In the days of King Messiach, one shall not say unto the other, ‘Teach me this Wisdom.’

THE fifth conformation. Another path goeth forth beneath the mouth. This is that which is written in the saying of Micah: “LA HChZIQ LOD APV, Lo Hecheziq Lead Apo, He hath not kept his anger for ever.” “Arise! Rabbi Yosi!”

Rabbi Yosi arose, and commencing said, Ps. cxliv. 15: “‘Blessed is the people that is in such a case; blessed is the people whose God is Tetragrammaton.’

We have learned that before the companions departed from this Assembly, Rabbi Yosi, Rabbi Chizqiah, and Rabbi Yisa died.

Therefore, all the others having gone forth, there remained Rabbi Eleazar his son, and Rabbi Abba, and Rabbi Yehudah, and Rabbi Yosi Bar Yoqeb, and Rabbi Chiya.

Rebbi Tanḥum bar Yudan said: The honor of the day takes precedence over the honor of the night. The Qiddush of the night takes precedence over the Qiddush of the day. What is the honor of the day? Rebbi Yosi in the name of Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa, and Rebbi Eleazar bar Joseph in the name of Rav: “He Who created the fruit of the vine.”

And R' Yehudah said in the name of Rav, one kortob of wine fell in three logs of water, and it looks like wine, and this fell in a mikvah, it [the mikvah] is not impure. R' Kahana argued, and what is the difference between this and coloured water? As we learnt, R' Yosi says, coloured water makes a mikvah impure. Rava said to him, there it is called coloured water, here it is called diluted wine.

Rebbi Yosi says, In what are these words [that one disqualified witness can disqualify three] said? Only by capital cases, but by monetary cases the testimony can be maintained with the remaining [two witnesses]. Rebbi says, This [ruling] applies by both monetary cases and capital cases.

Rebbi Yosi says, in what were these words said? etc. what should two brothers do? etc.: What do we say to the witnesses?

It has been said, Rav Yehuda says in the name of Shmuel, The law follows Rebbi Yosi. And Rav Nachman says, The law follows Rebbi.

Rebbi Yosi says, A person is never executed unless he has two witnesses warn him, as the Torah says (Deuteronomy 17, 6), "by the mouths of two witnesses". Another interpretation of "by the mouths of two witnesses" is that the court cannot here a case through an interpreter.

Rebbi Yosi says, etc.: Rav Papa asked Abaii, And does Rebbi Yosi indeed adhere to that logic? But we learned in a mishna, Rebbi Yosi says, An enemy is killed, because he is like someone who had purpose and was warned.

Rebbi Yosi says, etc.: Rav Papa asked Abaii, And does Rebbi Yosi indeed adhere to that logic? But we learned in a mishna, Rebbi Yosi says, An enemy is killed, because he is like someone who had purpose and was warned.

Rebbi Yosi says, etc.: Rav Papa asked Abaii, And does Rebbi Yosi indeed adhere to that logic? But we learned in a mishna, Rebbi Yosi says, An enemy is killed, because he is like someone who had purpose and was warned.

He answered That was Rebbi Yosi bar Yehuda, That we learned in a beraisa, Rebbi Yosi bar Yehudah says, A sage does not require a warning because a warning is only given to differentiate between purpose and accident.

He answered That was Rebbi Yosi bar Yehuda, That we learned in a beraisa, Rebbi Yosi bar Yehudah says, A sage does not require a warning because a warning is only given to differentiate between purpose and accident.

It's as was taught in a baraisa, Rebbi Yosi bar Yehuda says, Initially, both accidental [murderers] and wilful [murderers] would proceed to the cities of refuge, and the court would summon them from there,

Just as the city protects, so to it's boundary protects. A killer who went outside of the boundrary [of the city of refuge] and the goel hadam found him. Rebbi Yosi haGalili says, It's a mitzvah in the hands of the goel hadam [to kill him], and permitted for everyone else. Rebbi Akiva says, It's permitted in the hands of the goel hadam [to kill him], and everyone else is liable for [killing] him.

According to Reish Lakash, there is no difficulty, it is a case of two differing opinion on what Rebbi Yehudah held. According to Rebbi Yochanon, there is no difficulty, one statement [of Rebbi Yehuda's] is his own and one is his rebbi's [Rebbi Yosi Haggilli.

Who is this statement in accordance with? It is in accordance with the following Tanna, That it was taught in a baraisa, Rebbi Yosi said over three things from three elders. Rebbi Yishmael said, A person may ascend with his maaser sheni to Jerusalem and eat it nowadays. And this can be logically derived, A Bechor needs to be brought to "the place" and maaser sheni needs to be brought to "the place". Just as bechor is only possible in the time of the Temple, so is Maaser only possible in the time of the Temple.

[offerings of] higher holiness. etc.: It was taught already taught in [the previous] Mishna, Maaser sheni and Hekdesh that were not redeemed. [Why then, does our Mishna need to repeat this?] Rebbi Yosi bar Chanina says The latter is referring to [a case where the] maaser sheni is tahor [spiritually pure] and the man [eating it] is also tahor but is eating it out of the wall [of Jerusalem]. The former, however, is referring to [a case where the] maaser sheni is tamai [spiritually impure] or the man [eating it] is tamai and is eating it inside Jerusalem].

Rebbi Yosi says, From where do we learn that one who makes 1 incision for 5 dead is culpable [for the punishment of lashes] for each person [incised for]? It is learned [from Leviticus 19:28 in the word] "for a person" (La-nefesh) that a person is culpable for each individual dead person.

GEMARA: (Rav Bibi asked in the name of Rebbi Yosi, Is wearing considered literally wearing or is it) even if he just took in ant out his hand from his sleeve? Rav Acha brei dRav Ikka demonstrated by inserting [his hand] and removing [it]. Rav Ashi said that even if one only waited the amount of time in which he could have undressed and redressed, he would be liable.

"Nor does he take a bribe against the innocent" like Rebbi Yishmael Ben Yosi

"Who shakes his hands from accepting a bribe", like Rebbi Yishmael b'Rebbi Yosi.

Rebbi Yosi bar Chanina says, four decrees were decreed by Moshe Rabainu on Israel. Four [later] prophets came and nullified them. Moshe said (Deuteronomy 33,28) "And Israel dwells in safety, The fountain of Yakov alone". Came Amos and nullified it as it is said, (Amos 7,5) "Please now, How can Yakkov stand? etc." And it is written later, (Amos 7,3) "God repented concerning this etc.".