recited

Is that to say that Shmuel was holds that Esther was not said under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit? But did not Shmuel say that Esther was said under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit? It was composed to be recited [by heart], but not to be written.

“The recitation of the Shema”, as it has been taught: The Shema must be recited as it is written, the words of Rabbi. The Sages say: It may be recited in any language. What is Rabbi’s reason? Scripture says

“The recitation of the Shema”, as it has been taught: The Shema must be recited as it is written, the words of Rabbi. The Sages say: It may be recited in any language. What is Rabbi’s reason? Scripture says

But the Sages too, is it not written, “And they shall be”? — They require this to teach that it should not be recited backwards. From where does Rabbi derive the rule that it should not be recited backwards? From “words” “the words.” The Sages do not accept a distinction between “words” and “the words.”

But the Sages too, is it not written, “And they shall be”? — They require this to teach that it should not be recited backwards. From where does Rabbi derive the rule that it should not be recited backwards? From “words” “the words.” The Sages do not accept a distinction between “words” and “the words.”

May we say that Rabbi holds that the whole Torah can be recited in any language? For should you assume that it must be recited] only in the holy tongue, why would I need the words “and they shall be”?

May we say that Rabbi holds that the whole Torah can be recited in any language? For should you assume that it must be recited] only in the holy tongue, why would I need the words “and they shall be”?

May we then say that the Sages held that the whole of the Torah could be recited only in the holy tongue, for should you assume that it could be recited in any language, why would it write “Hear”?

May we then say that the Sages held that the whole of the Torah could be recited only in the holy tongue, for should you assume that it could be recited in any language, why would it write “Hear”?

But does he thereby fulfill his obligation? Has not R. Helbo said in the name of R. Hama b. Guria who said it in the name of Rav, The halakhah is according to the one who says that all of it [must be recited], and even according to the one who says that it is sufficient [to recite] from "A Jew was" (Esther 2:5), it is necessary that the whole should be [already] written?

The law, however, is that tefillin do not require lines, but mezuzot do require lines, and both may be written without a copy. What is the reason? — They are frequently recited.

A tanna recited in the presence of R. Nahman: One who has just said prayers should go a distance of four cubits and urinate, and one who has urinated should go a distance of four cubits and pray.

Sheshet said: The taking away of Torah [study] should correspond to its giving: just as it was given in the presence of sixty myriads, so to it should be taken away only in the presence of sixty myriads. This applies to one who read Scripture and recited Mishnah; but for one who [also] taught the Mishnah there is no limit.

MISHNA: One who eats bikorim [first fruits] before the verses are recited; [or eats] kadshai kadshim [offerings of greater sanctity] outside the curtain [of the temple courtyard; or one who eats] kadshai kalim [offerings of lesser sanctity] or maiser sheni outside the wall [of Jerusalem]; or one who breaks the bone of a pure Pesach offering. All of these incur forty lashes. But one who leaves over from [even a tahor i.e. a pure] offering, or one who breaks a bone of a tamai [impure] offering does not incur malkus.

Rebbi Shimon said, What is this verse coming to teach us? If to [make one liable for eating bikorim] outside the wall [of Jerusalem, then we could have just learned it out from] a kal v'chomer from maiser, which is more lenient, that if one incurs malkus by eating the more lenient example of maiser outside of the wall, then wouldn't one certainly incur malkus for eating bikorim outside of the wall? Rather the Torah only comes to teach us that one who eats bikorim before the verses are recited incurs malkus.